American Apparel 'naked' ad banned by watchdog
by Hadassah Nymark, campaignlive.co.uk, 02 September 2009, 00:01am
LONDON - A magazine ad for the fashion retailer American Apparel that showed a young girl partially naked has been banned by the Advertising Standards Authority.
The watchdog upheld a complaint that the ad was offensive and irresponsible as the girl appeared to be under 16 years of age.
American Apparel said the ad was intended to appeal to women, and that the model was shown to be in a relaxed "home" environment, wearing the hoody as a consumer might.
The retailer told the ASA the model was 23. It did not believe the ad to be gratuitous as the model remained clothed, wearing the hoody and a pair of shorts. The ad was intended to focus on the hoody as opposed to the model, and she was not portrayed as a sex object or in a negative light, it said.
The ad appeared in Vice magazine, which the retailer understood was targeted at 18- to 34-year-olds. It had previously advertised in Vice with similarly styled images.
The ASA considered that although the model was 23, the natural and minimal styling of the ads made her appear under 16.
The watchdog concluded that the ad was inappropriate and must not appear again in its current form.
First the BBC calls for over 50's, now American Apparel's advertising style makes the models look under 16. Apparently the model must wear make up in order to look old enough, and looking natural makes you younger, so being older makes you unnatural?
Although some believe it was correct action by the ASA, it's a bit over the top. The advertisement was in Vice magazine, and we've seen more nudity in Vogue and i-D. Advertising needs to relax a bit more if it wants to develop. Banning this ad just makes the UK advertising authority seem prude; is it really that offensive?